Advertisement
I've been using acid pro for several years and have found that while it's one of the finest programs for musical expression, the mastering side, falls a little short.
1st off I guess I need to say is that I hardly ever use the pluggins that come with the software. I have found that the Sony pluggings tend to be somewhat cpu intensive and are not up to the quality of the Acid software so I use one of the Waves bundles almost exclusivly.
Now on to mastering and pre-mastering..oops got the cronological order wrong lol.
Generaly, these days, if I'm working on quality production, I'll work my track panning, DB and hrz levels so most everything is balanced, won't cause ear fatigue due to hrz levels being to high or low and once these things are done, I'll pre-master the whole project at -10 to -12 dbs, render as a .wav then master in T-Racks using, as a start, one of the pre-sets which comes closest to the feel I want to achive, adjusting and fine tuning from that point.
The master .wav with be rendered at -2 to -1 DBs.
I've found that for depth, clearity and width that this works best for me...at least until I find a better way.
A lot of people i know use the Waves ultra maximizer to master with, but my experiance has been that it doesn't give finite control like T-Racks and tends to bring out a "metalic" digital sound/feel without much warmth.
I hope this may have been helpful and if anybody has other methods, feel free to add to this thread 8-)
1st off I guess I need to say is that I hardly ever use the pluggins that come with the software. I have found that the Sony pluggings tend to be somewhat cpu intensive and are not up to the quality of the Acid software so I use one of the Waves bundles almost exclusivly.
Now on to mastering and pre-mastering..oops got the cronological order wrong lol.
Generaly, these days, if I'm working on quality production, I'll work my track panning, DB and hrz levels so most everything is balanced, won't cause ear fatigue due to hrz levels being to high or low and once these things are done, I'll pre-master the whole project at -10 to -12 dbs, render as a .wav then master in T-Racks using, as a start, one of the pre-sets which comes closest to the feel I want to achive, adjusting and fine tuning from that point.
The master .wav with be rendered at -2 to -1 DBs.
I've found that for depth, clearity and width that this works best for me...at least until I find a better way.
A lot of people i know use the Waves ultra maximizer to master with, but my experiance has been that it doesn't give finite control like T-Racks and tends to bring out a "metalic" digital sound/feel without much warmth.
I hope this may have been helpful and if anybody has other methods, feel free to add to this thread 8-)
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: mastering and premastering with acid and other progs
Sat, November 26, 2005 - 7:59 PMI love the Waves UltraMaximizer just for the minority report.
I've used it on all four of my commercial releases.
I've discovered (and been told this by several professional mastering engineers) that if you really understand the concepts of timbral masking...........don't over saturate your individual bandwidths and then understand how to arrange a track in stereo very well that the biggest part of mastering is getting the levels as hot as you can so that your stuff sounds good against other material.
I was shown a very simple trick for getting your tracks up to red book specs in terms of final volume.
I've never heard the metallic, cold sound you talk about but then again I do a lot of abstract electronica and found sound live looping work so I haven't tried this system with , say, a lot of pristine acoustic instruments where you would hear more of the WAVES drawbacks.
Where do you notice this phenomenon? on what material.........I'm curious to learn more. -
-
Re: mastering and premastering with acid and other progs
Sun, November 27, 2005 - 8:53 AMI used to use the Ultra for vocals, this is where this stands out, I would compensate by really pounding on an eq, adding a tiny bit of dry, very dry, warm reverb. Sometimes the metalic digital sound is great, just depends on what your looking for.
It's just my pref to final master with one stand alone or one one pluggin (after all the pre-mastering is done on the individual tracks).
If you have some clean vocal samps..you might want to try messing around with them with the Ultra. Then, if you have T-Racks, do the same using the clean samp. -
-
Re: mastering and premastering with acid and other progs
Sun, November 27, 2005 - 9:21 AMhere's a piece where I used both, I used the Ultra on the "dj" vocal track and then mastered the whole piece in T-Racks...if you notice, the streaming rate is 64 kbps. I nearly always try and put together my streaming pieces so they are dial-up friendly.
Please believe me when I say that there was a bit of a learning curve to produce listenable music at low bit rates with the freekin wma compression that happens below 128 kbps. -
-
Re: mastering and premastering with acid and other progs
Sun, November 27, 2005 - 9:22 AMoops lol lmao! here's the link...doh!
www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp
-
-
-